Kevin K. Russell

Private practice · Bethesda, Md. · Attorney · argued OT 2010–2026

10arguments since OT 2010
2–7record (side argued for), 22%
45Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
58%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)

Arguments by term

Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
3101214161820222426

Arguments

TermCaseSideRoleResultRemarks facedDoubt (Jev)
OT 2026Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc. v. Commissioners of Boulder CountyRespondentAttorney–44–
OT 2024Facebook v. Amalgamated BankRespondentAttorneyWon5251%
OT 2022Slack Technologies v. PiraniRespondentAttorneyLost3748%
OT 2016Henson v. Santander Consumer USA Inc.PetitionerAttorneyLost2574%
OT 2014Mcfadden v. United StatesPetitionerAttorneyWon5744%
OT 2013Loughrin v. United StatesPetitionerAttorneyLost5858%
OT 2013Air Wisconsin Airlines Corp. v. HoeperRespondentAttorneyLost4863%
OT 2013Daimlerchrysler Ag v. BaumanRespondentAttorneyLost5277%
OT 2011Tammy Foret Freeman et al. v. Quicken Loans, Inc.PetitionerAttorneyLost4671%
OT 2010Harvey Leroy Sossamon, III v. Texas et al.PetitionerAttorneyLost2639%

Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).