Kelsi B. Corkran
Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Attorney · argued OT 2017–2025
6arguments since OT 2010
2–4record (side argued for), 33%
61Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
51%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2025 | Noem, Secretary of Homeland Security et al. v. Al Otro Lado et al. | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 82 | 57% |
| OT 2024 | Trump, President of the United States v. Casa, Inc. | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 55 | 33% |
| OT 2023 | City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. Johnson | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 66 | 52% |
| OT 2023 | Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Laufer | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 56 | 53% |
| OT 2020 | Torres v. Madrid | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 36 | 57% |
| OT 2017 | City of Hays, Kansas v. Vogt | Respondent | Attorney | Won | 69 | 56% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).