Kathleen M. Sullivan
Private practice · New York, N.Y. · Attorney · argued OT 2010–2016
6arguments since OT 2010
3–2record (side argued for), 60%
37Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
77%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2016 | Samsung Electronics v. Apple | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 27 | 52% |
| OT 2016 | State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. United States, Ex Rel Rigsby | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 38 | 80% |
| OT 2013 | Pom Wonderful LLC v. Coca-cola Co. | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 36 | 84% |
| OT 2012 | Esther Kiobel, Individually and on Behalf of Her Late Husband, Dr. Barinem Kiobel et al. v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. et al. | Respondent | Attorney | Won | 36 | 87% |
| OT 2011 | No. 10-1491 | Respondent | Attorney | – | 50 | – |
| OT 2010 | Russel Bruesewitz et al. v. Wyeth LLC, Fka Wyeth, Inc., Fka Wyeth Laboratories et al. | Respondent | Attorney | Won | 37 | 84% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).