Judd E. Stone, II
State government · Austin, Texas · State Solicitor General · argued OT 2021–2022
8arguments since OT 2010
2–5record (side argued for), 29%
54Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
66%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2022 | United States v. Texas | Respondent | State Solicitor General | Lost | 121 | 77% |
| OT 2022 | Reed v. Goertz | Respondent | State Solicitor General | Lost | 36 | – |
| OT 2022 | Haaland v. Brackeen | – | State Solicitor General | – | 74 | 65% |
| OT 2021 | Biden v. Texas | Respondent | State Solicitor General | Lost | 45 | 75% |
| OT 2021 | United States v. Texas | Respondent | State Solicitor General | Won | 33 | 72% |
| OT 2021 | Ramirez v. Collier | Respondent | State Solicitor General | Lost | 38 | 48% |
| OT 2021 | Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson | Respondent | State Solicitor General | Won | 53 | 62% |
| OT 2021 | Torres v. Texas Department of Public Safety | Respondent | State Solicitor General | Lost | 29 | 64% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).