Joseph R. Palmore
Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Assistant to the Solicitor General, Attorney · argued OT 2010–2024
13arguments since OT 2010
9–3record (side argued for), 75%
49Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
62%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2024 | Mclaughlin Chiropractic Associates v. Mckesson Corporation | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 37 | 54% |
| OT 2019 | Thole v. U.S. Bank, N.A. | Respondent | Attorney | Won | 62 | 57% |
| OT 2019 | Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Christian | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 52 | 74% |
| OT 2013 | CTS Corp. v. Waldburger | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 12 | 69% |
| OT 2013 | Fernandez v. California | Amicus (for respondent) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 16 | 59% |
| OT 2013 | Abramski v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 51 | 54% |
| OT 2012 | Marvin D. Horne et al. v. Department of Agriculture | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 54 | 71% |
| OT 2012 | Florida v. Clayton Harris | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 16 | – |
| OT 2012 | Us Airways, Inc., in Its Capacity As Fiduciary and Plan Administrator of the Us Airways, Inc. Employee Benefits Plan v. James E. Mccutchen et al. | Amicus | Assistant to the Solicitor General | – | 20 | 71% |
| OT 2011 | Pacific Operators Offshore, LLP et al. v. Luisa L. Valladolid et al. | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 32 | 70% |
| OT 2011 | Dana Roberts v. Sea-land Services, Inc. et al. | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 52 | 59% |
| OT 2010 | Chase Bank USA, NA. v. James A. Mccoy, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 12 | 39% |
| OT 2010 | Borough of Duryea, Pennsylvania et al. v. Charles J Guarnieri | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 13 | 64% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).