Joseph A. Kanefield

State government · Phoenix, Arizona · State Attorney General's office · argued OT 2022

1argument since OT 2010
0–1record (side argued for), 0%
51Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
74%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)

Arguments by term

Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
122

Arguments

TermCaseSideRoleResultRemarks facedDoubt (Jev)
OT 2022Cruz v. ArizonaRespondentState Attorney General's officeLost5174%

Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).