Jonathan Y. Ellis
Office of the Solicitor General · Washington, D.C. · Assistant to the Solicitor General · argued OT 2017–2021
9arguments since OT 2010
6–1record (side argued for), 86%
34Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
57%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2021 | Thompson v. Clark | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 28 | 33% |
| OT 2020 | No. 20-444 | Petitioner | Assistant to the Solicitor General | – | 17 | – |
| OT 2020 | Facebook Inc. v. Duguid | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 23 | 62% |
| OT 2019 | Thryv v. Click-to-call Technologies, LP | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 26 | 78% |
| OT 2019 | No. 18-1165 | Amicus | Assistant to the Solicitor General | – | 7 | – |
| OT 2019 | Ge Energy Power Conversion France Sas v. Outokumpu Stainless USA LLC | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 17 | 67% |
| OT 2018 | Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. Wall-street.com | Amicus (for respondent) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 5 | 33% |
| OT 2018 | Jam v. Int'l Finance Corp. | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 21 | 50% |
| OT 2017 | Rosales-mireles v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 51 | 73% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).