Jonathan I. Blackman

Private practice · New York, New York · Attorney · argued OT 2013

2arguments since OT 2010
0–2record (side argued for), 0%
32Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
80%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)

Arguments by term

Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
213

Arguments

TermCaseSideRoleResultRemarks facedDoubt (Jev)
OT 2013Republic of Argentina v. NML Capital, Ltd.PetitionerAttorneyLost2977%
OT 2013BG Group PLC v. Republic of ArgentinaRespondentAttorneyLost3483%

Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).