Jonathan A. Herstoff

Private practice · New York, New York · Attorney · argued OT 2017–2018

2arguments since OT 2010
1–1record (side argued for), 50%
55Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
62%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)

Arguments by term

Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
11718

Arguments

TermCaseSideRoleResultRemarks facedDoubt (Jev)
OT 2018Nutraceutical Corp. v. LambertRespondentAttorneyLost5575%
OT 2017Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Services of ChicagoPetitionerAttorneyWon5549%

Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).