John P. Elwood
Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Attorney · argued OT 2010–2022
5arguments since OT 2010
5–0record (side argued for), 100%
60Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
61%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2022 | Counterman v. Colorado | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 62 | 42% |
| OT 2014 | Elonis v. United States | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 63 | 68% |
| OT 2014 | Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Carter | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 40 | 64% |
| OT 2013 | Rosemond v. United States | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 72 | 64% |
| OT 2010 | Nevada Commission on Ethics v. Michael A. Carrigan | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 62 | 66% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).