John C. Neiman Jr.
State government · Montgomery, Alabama · State Solicitor General · argued OT 2011
2arguments since OT 2010
0–2record (side argued for), 0%
60Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
62%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2011 | Evan Miller v. Alabama | Respondent | State Solicitor General | Lost | 52 | 57% |
| OT 2011 | Cory R. Maples v. Kim T. Thomas, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections | Respondent | State Solicitor General | Lost | 68 | 68% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).