Jeffrey L. Fisher
Private practice · Menlo Park, California · Attorney, State Solicitor General · argued OT 2010–2024
36arguments since OT 2010
17–18record (side argued for), 49%
46Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
64%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2024 | Tiktok, Inc. v. Garland | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 73 | 72% |
| OT 2024 | Kousisis v. United States | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 75 | 63% |
| OT 2023 | Erlinger v. United States | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 55 | 42% |
| OT 2023 | Diaz v. United States | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 112 | 59% |
| OT 2022 | Dubin v. United States | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 93 | 60% |
| OT 2021 | Hemphill v. New York | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 42 | 56% |
| OT 2020 | No. 20-444 | Respondent | Attorney | – | 36 | – |
| OT 2020 | Lange v. California | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 39 | 63% |
| OT 2020 | Van Buren v. United States | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 28 | 71% |
| OT 2020 | Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 29 | 41% |
| OT 2019 | Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-berru | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 32 | 66% |
| OT 2018 | United States v. Stitt | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 37 | 61% |
| OT 2018 | Mount Lemmon Fire District v. Guido | Respondent | Attorney | Won | 15 | 81% |
| OT 2018 | Jam v. Int'l Finance Corp. | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 11 | 54% |
| OT 2017 | Koons v. United States | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 24 | 69% |
| OT 2017 | Jesner v. Arab Bank, PLC | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 38 | 57% |
| OT 2017 | Currier v. Virginia | Petitioner | State Solicitor General | Lost | 61 | 51% |
| OT 2016 | Esquivel-quintana v. Sessions | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 32 | 78% |
| OT 2016 | Endrew F. v. Douglas Cnty. Sch. Dist. Re-1 | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 25 | 70% |
| OT 2016 | Pena-rodriguez v. Colorado | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 52 | 61% |
| OT 2016 | Microsoft Corp. v. Baker | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 59 | 39% |
| OT 2015 | Obb Personenverkehr Ag v. Sachs | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 50 | 75% |
| OT 2014 | T Mobile South, LLC v. City of Roswell, Georgia. | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 41 | 70% |
| OT 2014 | Heien v. North Carolina | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 49 | 75% |
| OT 2014 | Oneok, Inc., v. Learjet, Inc. | Amicus (for respondent) | State Solicitor General | Won | 28 | 71% |
| OT 2014 | Ohio v. Clark | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 37 | 76% |
| OT 2013 | Riley v. California | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 48 | 60% |
| OT 2013 | Fernandez v. California | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 43 | 82% |
| OT 2012 | Genovevo Salinas v. Texas | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 51 | 74% |
| OT 2012 | Roselva Chaidez v. United States | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 52 | – |
| OT 2012 | Fane Lozman v. the City of Riviera Beach, Florida | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 35 | 76% |
| OT 2012 | Doug Decker, in His Official Capacity As Oregon State Forester et al. v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center; | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 32 | 52% |
| OT 2011 | Asid Mohamad, Individually and for the Estate of Azzam Rahim, Deceased et al. v. Palestinian Authority et al. | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 51 | 74% |
| OT 2011 | Eric Greene, Aka Jarmaine Q. Trice v. Jon Fisher, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Smithfield et al. | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 47 | 61% |
| OT 2010 | United States v. Jason Louis Tinklenberg | Respondent | Attorney | Won | 31 | 78% |
| OT 2010 | Donald Bullcoming v. New Mexico | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 63 | 55% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).