Jeffrey B. Wall
Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Assistant to the Solicitor General, Attorney, Deputy Solicitor General, Office of the Solicitor General · argued OT 2010–2025
30arguments since OT 2010
13–6record (side argued for), 68%
42Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
72%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2025 | Federal Communications Commission et al. v. AT&T Inc. et al. | – | Attorney | – | 76 | 63% |
| OT 2024 | Diamond Alternative Energy LLC v. Environmental Protection Agency | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 41 | 64% |
| OT 2023 | Great Lakes Insurance Se v. Raiders Retreat Realty Co., LLC | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 41 | 57% |
| OT 2020 | Trump v. New York | Petitioner | Office of the Solicitor General | Won | 47 | 61% |
| OT 2020 | California v. Texas | – | Office of the Solicitor General | – | 29 | 56% |
| OT 2020 | United States. v. Briggs | Petitioner | Office of the Solicitor General | Won | 26 | 57% |
| OT 2019 | Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP | Amicus (for petitioner) | Deputy Solicitor General | Won | 19 | – |
| OT 2019 | No. 18-280 | Amicus (for petitioner) | Deputy Solicitor General | – | 16 | – |
| OT 2019 | Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. Aurelius Investment, LLC | – | Deputy Solicitor General | – | 26 | 67% |
| OT 2019 | June Medical Services LLC v. Russo | Amicus | Deputy Solicitor General | – | 16 | 88% |
| OT 2019 | Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue | Amicus (for petitioner) | Deputy Solicitor General | Won | 17 | 78% |
| OT 2019 | Hernandez v. Mesa | Amicus (for respondent) | Deputy Solicitor General | Won | 18 | 90% |
| OT 2018 | Mcdonough v. Smith | Amicus | Deputy Solicitor General | – | 21 | 86% |
| OT 2018 | Frank v. Gaos | Amicus | Deputy Solicitor General | – | 20 | 67% |
| OT 2018 | Gundy v. United States | Respondent | Deputy Solicitor General | Won | 40 | 83% |
| OT 2018 | American Legion v. American Humanist Association | Amicus | Office of the Solicitor General | – | 21 | 77% |
| OT 2018 | Nieves v. Bartlett | Amicus (for petitioner) | Deputy Solicitor General | Won | 12 | 46% |
| OT 2017 | Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach, Florida | Amicus | Deputy Solicitor General | – | 8 | 89% |
| OT 2017 | Lucia v. SEC | Respondent | Deputy Solicitor General | Lost | 32 | 64% |
| OT 2017 | Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association | Amicus (for respondent) | Deputy Solicitor General | Lost | 12 | 77% |
| OT 2017 | Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis | Amicus (for petitioner) | Deputy Solicitor General | Won | 26 | 63% |
| OT 2017 | National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra | Amicus | Deputy Solicitor General | – | 16 | 65% |
| OT 2015 | Halo Electronics v. Pulse Electronics | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 26 | 68% |
| OT 2012 | Armarcion D. Henderson v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 41 | 79% |
| OT 2012 | Chunon L. Bailey, Aka Polo v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 52 | 85% |
| OT 2012 | Marc J. Gabelli and Bruce Alpert v. Securities and Exchange Commission | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 61 | 86% |
| OT 2011 | Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC et al. v. Vanessa Simmonds | Amicus | Assistant to the Solicitor General | – | 19 | 63% |
| OT 2011 | Luis Mariano Martinez v. Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections | Amicus (for respondent) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 14 | 80% |
| OT 2010 | Kevin Kasten v. Saint-gobain Performance Plastics Corporation | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 21 | – |
| OT 2010 | Marcus Sykes v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 52 | 87% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).