Jane E. Notz
State government · Chicago, Illinois · State Solicitor General · argued OT 2025
1argument since OT 2010
0–1record (side argued for), 0%
60Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
68%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2025 | Bost et al. v. Illinois State Board of Elections et al. | Respondent | State Solicitor General | Lost | 60 | 68% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).