James W. Dabney

Private practice · New York, N.Y. · Attorney · argued OT 2012–2016

2arguments since OT 2010
1–1record (side argued for), 50%
40Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
73%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)

Arguments by term

Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
11213141516

Arguments

TermCaseSideRoleResultRemarks facedDoubt (Jev)
OT 2016TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group BrandsPetitionerAttorneyWon3467%
OT 2012Already, LLC, Dba Yums v. Nike, Inc.PetitionerAttorneyLost4579%

Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).