James K. Lehman
Private practice · Columbia, South Carolina · Attorney · argued OT 2019
1argument since OT 2010
0–1record (side argued for), 0%
33Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
63%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2019 | Ritzen Group Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, LLC | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 33 | 63% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).