James A. Feldman
Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Attorney · argued OT 2012–2017
5arguments since OT 2010
1–4record (side argued for), 20%
45Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
71%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2017 | Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 24 | 64% |
| OT 2016 | Advocate Health Care Network v. Stapleton | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 74 | 68% |
| OT 2014 | Bullard v. Blue Hills Bank | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 58 | – |
| OT 2013 | Ray Haluch Gravel Co. v. Cent. Pension Fund of Int'l Union of Operating Eng'rs | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 41 | 81% |
| OT 2012 | Steven Alan Levin v. United States et al. | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 28 | – |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).