J. Gordon Cooney Jr.

Private practice · Philadelphia, Pennsylvania · Attorney · argued OT 2010

1argument since OT 2010
0–1record (side argued for), 0%
75Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
62%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)

Arguments by term

Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
110

Arguments

TermCaseSideRoleResultRemarks facedDoubt (Jev)
OT 2010Harry F. Connick, District Attorney et al. v. John ThompsonRespondentAttorneyLost7562%

Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).