J. David Breemer
Private practice · Sacramento, California · Attorney · argued OT 2017–2018
3arguments since OT 2010
3–0record (side argued for), 100%
50Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
64%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2018 | Knick v. Township of Scott, Pennsylvania | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 29 | – |
| OT 2018 | Knick v. Township of Scott, Pennsylvania | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 53 | 75% |
| OT 2017 | Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 68 | 54% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).