Ilana H. Eisenstein
Office of the Solicitor General · Washington, D.C. · Assistant to the Solicitor General · argued OT 2014–2016
5arguments since OT 2010
4–1record (side argued for), 80%
22Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
69%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2016 | Howell v. Howell | Amicus (for respondent) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 24 | 80% |
| OT 2016 | Manuel v. City of Joliet | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 19 | 70% |
| OT 2015 | Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 15 | 63% |
| OT 2015 | Voisine v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 29 | 83% |
| OT 2014 | Ohio v. Clark | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 11 | 50% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).