Hashim M. Mooppan
Office of the Solicitor General · Washington, D.C. · Attorney, Office of the Solicitor General, Deputy Solicitor General · argued OT 2014–2025
10arguments since OT 2010
8–1record (side argued for), 89%
63Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
63%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2025 | Chiles v. Salazar et al. | Amicus (for petitioner) | Deputy Solicitor General | Won | 33 | 58% |
| OT 2025 | West Virginia et al. v. B. P. J. | Amicus (for petitioner) | Deputy Solicitor General | Won | 55 | 58% |
| OT 2025 | Little, Governor of Idaho et al. v. Hecox et al. | Amicus (for petitioner) | Deputy Solicitor General | Won | 44 | 70% |
| OT 2025 | Louisiana v. Callais et al. | Amicus (for respondent) | Deputy Solicitor General | Won | 92 | 66% |
| OT 2024 | Kennedy v. Braidwood Management | Petitioner | Deputy Solicitor General | Won | 71 | 51% |
| OT 2023 | O'connor-ratcliff v. Garnier | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 93 | 62% |
| OT 2020 | Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski | Amicus (for petitioner) | Office of the Solicitor General | Won | 30 | 63% |
| OT 2020 | Collins v. Yellen | – | Office of the Solicitor General | – | 39 | – |
| OT 2020 | Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania | Amicus (for petitioner) | Office of the Solicitor General | Won | 35 | 62% |
| OT 2014 | NC Bd. of Dental Examiners v. FTC | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 48 | 80% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).