Hari Santhanam
Private practice · Chicago, Illinois · Attorney · argued OT 2023
1argument since OT 2010
1–0record (side argued for), 100%
50Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
54%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2023 | Smith v. Arizona | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 50 | 54% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).