Gregory G. Garre

Private practice · Bethesda, Maryland · Attorney · argued OT 2010–2025

22arguments since OT 2010

9–12record (side argued for), 43%

50Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)

71%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)

Arguments by term

Side wonSide lostPending / unclear

Arguments

Term	Case	Side	Role	Result	Remarks faced	Doubt (Jev)
OT 2025	Keathley v. Buddy Ayers Construction, Inc.	Petitioner	Attorney	Won	52	47%
OT 2024	Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board v. Drummond	Respondent	Attorney	Won	87	–
OT 2023	Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P.	Respondent	Attorney	Lost	54	61%
OT 2022	No. 21-1239	–	Attorney	–	39	–
OT 2021	Hughes v. Northwestern University	Respondent	Attorney	Lost	41	74%
OT 2020	Guam v. United States	Petitioner	Attorney	Won	35	50%
OT 2020	Florida v. Georgia	Petitioner	Attorney	Lost	29	57%
OT 2018	Emulex Corp. v. Varjabedian	Petitioner	Attorney	Lost	51	60%
OT 2017	Lamar, Archer & Cofrin v. Appling	Petitioner	Attorney	Lost	33	77%
OT 2017	Florida v. Georgia	Petitioner	Attorney	Won	59	67%
OT 2015	Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin	Respondent	Attorney	Won	61	63%
OT 2015	Campbell-ewald Co. v. Gomez	Petitioner	Attorney	Lost	67	87%
OT 2013	United States v. Woods	Respondent	Attorney	Lost	50	75%
OT 2012	Florida v. Clayton Harris	Petitioner	Attorney	Won	30	–
OT 2012	Florida v. Joelis Jardines	Petitioner	Attorney	Lost	45	87%
OT 2012	Maetta Vance v. Ball State University	Respondent	Attorney	Won	22	96%
OT 2012	Abigail Noel Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin et al.	Respondent	Attorney	Lost	78	76%
OT 2011	United States v. Home Concrete & Supply, LLC et al.	Respondent	Attorney	Won	37	82%
OT 2011	Cory R. Maples v. Kim T. Thomas, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections	Petitioner	Attorney	Won	78	60%
OT 2011	PPL Montana, LLC v. Montana	Respondent	Attorney	Lost	57	66%
OT 2011	Marcus D. Mims v. Arrow Financial Services, LLC	Respondent	Attorney	Lost	55	84%
OT 2010	Delbert Williamson et al. v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc. et al.	Respondent	Attorney	Lost	44	80%

Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).