Ginger D. Anders
Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Assistant to the Solicitor General, Attorney · argued OT 2010–2021
17arguments since OT 2010
11–5record (side argued for), 69%
43Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
64%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2021 | United States v. Tsarnaev | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 38 | 53% |
| OT 2015 | Montanile v. Bd. of National Elevator Industry Health Benefit Plan | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 19 | 55% |
| OT 2015 | Betterman v. Montana | Amicus (for respondent) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 9 | 40% |
| OT 2015 | Heffernan v. City of Paterson, New Jersey | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 17 | 67% |
| OT 2014 | Rodriguez v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 56 | 75% |
| OT 2014 | Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 19 | 85% |
| OT 2014 | Teva Pharms. USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc. | Amicus | Assistant to the Solicitor General | – | 14 | 73% |
| OT 2013 | Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 17 | 44% |
| OT 2013 | Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co. | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 17 | 61% |
| OT 2013 | BG Group PLC v. Republic of Argentina | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 18 | 79% |
| OT 2012 | Aldona Wos, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services v. E. M. A., A Minor, by and Through Her Guardian Ad Litem, Daniel H. Johnson et al. | Amicus (for respondent) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 19 | 45% |
| OT 2012 | Genovevo Salinas v. Texas | Amicus (for respondent) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 15 | 56% |
| OT 2012 | Already, LLC, Dba Yums v. Nike, Inc. | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 19 | 80% |
| OT 2011 | Carol Howes, Warden v. Randall Lee Fields | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 16 | 88% |
| OT 2011 | David J. Kappos, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, Patent and Trademark Office v. Gilbert P. Hyatt | Petitioner | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 35 | 65% |
| OT 2010 | Virginia Office for Protection and Advocacy v. James W. Stewart III, Commissioner, Virginia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services et al. | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 29 | 60% |
| OT 2010 | Astra USA, Inc. et al. v. Santa Clara County, California | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 21 | 64% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).