Frederick R. Yarger
Private practice · Denver, Colorado · State Solicitor General, Attorney · argued OT 2016–2025
5arguments since OT 2010
0–4record (side argued for), 0%
46Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
72%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2025 | Harold Berk v. Wilson Choy et al. | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 52 | 67% |
| OT 2017 | Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission | Respondent | State Solicitor General | Lost | 76 | 65% |
| OT 2017 | No. 141-orig | Respondent | State Solicitor General | – | 22 | – |
| OT 2016 | Pena-rodriguez v. Colorado | Respondent | State Solicitor General | Lost | 22 | 74% |
| OT 2016 | Nelson v. Colorado | Respondent | State Solicitor General | Lost | 58 | 83% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).