Frederick Liu
Office of the Solicitor General · Washington, D.C. · Attorney, Assistant to the Solicitor General · argued OT 2015–2025
20arguments since OT 2010
10–6record (side argued for), 63%
65Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
59%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2025 | Pung, Personal Representative v. Isabella County, Michigan et al. | Amicus | Assistant to the Solicitor General | – | 56 | 41% |
| OT 2025 | Keathley v. Buddy Ayers Construction, Inc. | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 22 | 46% |
| OT 2025 | United States Postal Service et al. v. Konan | Petitioner | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 56 | 78% |
| OT 2024 | Martin v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 36 | 69% |
| OT 2024 | Stanley v. City of Sanford, Florida | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 24 | 19% |
| OT 2024 | City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 100 | 56% |
| OT 2023 | Pulsifer v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 105 | 60% |
| OT 2023 | Texas v. New Mexico and Colorado | – | Assistant to the Solicitor General | – | 76 | 45% |
| OT 2022 | Arizona v. Navajo Nation | – | Assistant to the Solicitor General | – | 112 | 50% |
| OT 2022 | U.S., ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 52 | 72% |
| OT 2021 | Golan v. Saada | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 40 | 48% |
| OT 2021 | Mississippi v. Tennessee | Amicus | Assistant to the Solicitor General | – | 18 | 75% |
| OT 2020 | Rutledge v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Association | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 11 | 46% |
| OT 2020 | Jones v. Mississippi | Amicus (for respondent) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 17 | 43% |
| OT 2019 | Guerrero-lasprilla v. Barr | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 43 | 73% |
| OT 2019 | Barton v. Barr | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 42 | 81% |
| OT 2018 | Stokeling v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 65 | 91% |
| OT 2018 | Herrera v. Wyoming | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 28 | 69% |
| OT 2017 | Pereira v. Sessions, Att'y Gen. | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 60 | 64% |
| OT 2015 | Kansas v. Carr | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 27 | – |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).