Erin E. Murphy
Private practice · Alexandria, Virginia · Attorney · argued OT 2013–2025
5arguments since OT 2010
3–1record (side argued for), 75%
48Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
70%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2025 | United States v. Hemani | Respondent | Attorney | Won | 101 | 51% |
| OT 2017 | Gill v. Whitford | – | Attorney | – | 20 | 76% |
| OT 2015 | United States v. Texas | Amicus (for respondent) | Attorney | Won | 28 | – |
| OT 2015 | Husky International Electronics, Inc., v. Ritz | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 38 | 85% |
| OT 2013 | Mccutcheon v. Fec | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 34 | 69% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).