Erica L. Ross

Office of the Solicitor General · Washington, D.C. · Assistant to the Solicitor General · argued OT 2017–2024

16arguments since OT 2010
8–5record (side argued for), 62%
42Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
55%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)

Arguments by term

Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
31718192021222324

Arguments

TermCaseSideRoleResultRemarks facedDoubt (Jev)
OT 2024Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. ZuchPetitionerAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon5449%
OT 2023Acheson Hotels, LLC v. LauferAmicusAssistant to the Solicitor General–2840%
OT 2023Sheetz v. County of El Dorado, CaliforniaAmicus (for respondent)Assistant to the Solicitor GeneralLost1150%
OT 2022Lora v. United StatesRespondentAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralLost6066%
OT 2022Tyler v. Hennepin County, MinnesotaAmicusAssistant to the Solicitor General–4044%
OT 2022Bartenwerfer v. BuckleyAmicus (for respondent)Assistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon1556%
OT 2021Denezpi v. United StatesRespondentAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon5857%
OT 2021Wooden v. United StatesRespondentAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralLost5081%
OT 2020United States v. Palomar-santiagoPetitionerAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon2136%
OT 2020Lange v. CaliforniaAmicus (for respondent)Assistant to the Solicitor GeneralLost2252%
OT 2019U.S. Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com B.V.PetitionerAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralLost2547%
OT 2019Citgo Asphalt Refining Co. v. Frescati Shipping Co., Ltd.RespondentAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon2350%
OT 2019Opati v. Republic of SudanAmicus (for petitioner)Assistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon1036%
OT 2018United States v. StittPetitionerAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon4177%
OT 2018Republic of Sudan v. HarrisonAmicus (for petitioner)Assistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon1453%
OT 2017Currier v. VirginiaAmicusAssistant to the Solicitor General–1386%

Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).