Eric Schnapper
Private practice · Seattle, Wash. · Attorney · argued OT 2010–2022
10arguments since OT 2010
6–4record (side argued for), 60%
43Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
67%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2022 | Twitter v. Taamneh | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 51 | 69% |
| OT 2022 | Gonzalez v. Google LLC | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 108 | 57% |
| OT 2014 | Ala. Legislative Black Caucus v. Alabama | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 23 | 92% |
| OT 2014 | United States v. Kwai Fun Wong | Respondent | Attorney | Won | 34 | 66% |
| OT 2013 | Sandifer v. United States Steel Corp. | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 37 | 64% |
| OT 2013 | Lawson v. FMR LLC | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 26 | 64% |
| OT 2012 | Carolyn M. Kloeckner v. Hilda L. Solis, Secretary of Labor | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 46 | 44% |
| OT 2010 | Vincent E. Staub v. Proctor Hospital | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 26 | 71% |
| OT 2010 | Eric L. Thompson v. North American Stainless, LP | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 34 | 72% |
| OT 2010 | Borough of Duryea, Pennsylvania et al. v. Charles J Guarnieri | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 40 | 76% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).