Eric J. Feigin
Office of the Solicitor General · Washington, D.C. · Assistant to the Solicitor General, Deputy Solicitor General · argued OT 2010–2026
42arguments since OT 2010
18–17record (side argued for), 51%
50Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
63%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2026 | Beaird v. United States | Respondent | Deputy Solicitor General | – | 60 | – |
| OT 2025 | Chatrie v. United States | Respondent | Deputy Solicitor General | Lost | 107 | 61% |
| OT 2025 | Daniel Rutherford v. United States (Together With Johnnie Markel Carter V. United States, No. 24-860) | Respondent | Deputy Solicitor General | Won | 33 | 74% |
| OT 2025 | Fernandez v. United States | Respondent | Deputy Solicitor General | Won | 45 | 70% |
| OT 2024 | Delligatti v. United States | Respondent | Deputy Solicitor General | Won | 73 | 72% |
| OT 2023 | Erlinger v. United States | Amicus (for petitioner) | Deputy Solicitor General | Won | 38 | 38% |
| OT 2023 | Smith v. Arizona | Amicus | Deputy Solicitor General | – | 44 | 30% |
| OT 2022 | Counterman v. Colorado | Amicus (for respondent) | Deputy Solicitor General | Lost | 32 | 53% |
| OT 2022 | Jones v. Hendrix | Respondent | Deputy Solicitor General | Won | 34 | 35% |
| OT 2022 | Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. United States | Respondent | Deputy Solicitor General | Lost | 82 | 57% |
| OT 2022 | Ciminelli v. United States | Respondent | Deputy Solicitor General | Lost | 49 | 57% |
| OT 2021 | Ramirez v. Collier | Amicus | Deputy Solicitor General | – | 37 | 29% |
| OT 2021 | United States v. Tsarnaev | Petitioner | Deputy Solicitor General | Won | 63 | 59% |
| OT 2021 | Ruan v. United States | Respondent | Deputy Solicitor General | Lost | 89 | 52% |
| OT 2020 | Terry v. United States | Amicus (for petitioner) | Deputy Solicitor General | Lost | 36 | 46% |
| OT 2020 | Van Buren v. United States | Respondent | Deputy Solicitor General | Lost | 28 | 81% |
| OT 2020 | Borden v. United States | Respondent | Deputy Solicitor General | Lost | 28 | 70% |
| OT 2020 | United States v. Cooley | Petitioner | Deputy Solicitor General | Won | 34 | 41% |
| OT 2019 | United States v. Sineneng-smith | Petitioner | Deputy Solicitor General | Won | 41 | 67% |
| OT 2019 | No. 18-217 | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | – | 12 | – |
| OT 2019 | Kelly v. United States | Respondent | Deputy Solicitor General | Lost | 59 | 73% |
| OT 2018 | United States v. Davis | Petitioner | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 52 | 59% |
| OT 2018 | Gamble v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 38 | 82% |
| OT 2018 | United States v. Haymond | Petitioner | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 61 | 83% |
| OT 2017 | Koons v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 25 | 69% |
| OT 2017 | Class v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 44 | 84% |
| OT 2017 | Byrd v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 64 | 75% |
| OT 2016 | Lee v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 62 | 64% |
| OT 2016 | Star Athletica, L.L.C. v. Varsity Brands, Inc. | Amicus (for respondent) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 18 | 58% |
| OT 2016 | Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman | Amicus | Assistant to the Solicitor General | – | 21 | 46% |
| OT 2014 | Reed v. Town of Gilbert | Amicus | Assistant to the Solicitor General | – | 11 | 75% |
| OT 2014 | Comptroller of the Treasury v. Wynne | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 16 | 71% |
| OT 2014 | Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission | Amicus (for respondent) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 17 | 82% |
| OT 2013 | Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus | Amicus | Assistant to the Solicitor General | – | 10 | 64% |
| OT 2013 | Air Wisconsin Airlines Corp. v. Hoeper | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 13 | 64% |
| OT 2013 | United States v. Quality Stores, Inc. et al. | Petitioner | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 19 | 62% |
| OT 2012 | Marvin Peugh v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 46 | 68% |
| OT 2012 | United States v. Anthony Davila | Petitioner | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 20 | 59% |
| OT 2012 | Olivea Marx v. General Revenue Corporation | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 20 | 71% |
| OT 2011 | Elgin v. Department of Treasury | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 54 | – |
| OT 2011 | Federal Aviation Administration et al. v. Stanmore Cawthon Cooper | Petitioner | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 34 | 78% |
| OT 2010 | J. D. B. v. North Carolina | Amicus (for respondent) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 17 | 67% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).