Eric E. Murphy
Private practice · Columbus, Ohio · Attorney · argued OT 2013–2017
5arguments since OT 2010
2–3record (side argued for), 40%
39Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
58%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2017 | Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 51 | 60% |
| OT 2017 | National Association of Manufacturers v. Department of Defense | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 10 | 55% |
| OT 2017 | Ohio v. American Express Co. | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 33 | 44% |
| OT 2015 | Sheriff v. Gillie | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 49 | 59% |
| OT 2013 | Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 53 | 72% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).