Eric D. Miller

Private practice · Seattle, Washington · Assistant to the Solicitor General, Attorney · argued OT 2010–2017

8arguments since OT 2010
4–4record (side argued for), 50%
43Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
62%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)

Arguments by term

Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
31011121314151617

Arguments

TermCaseSideRoleResultRemarks facedDoubt (Jev)
OT 2017Upper Skagit Indian Tribe v. LundgrenRespondentAttorneyLost3867%
OT 2016Lewis v. ClarkeAmicus (for petitioner)Assistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon2541%
OT 2011Match-e-be-nash-she-wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. PatchakPetitionerAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralLost4071%
OT 2011Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security v. Karen K. Capato, on Behalf of B. N. C. et al.PetitionerAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon3759%
OT 2011Panagis Vartelas v. Eric H. Holder, JR., Attorney GeneralRespondentAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralLost3681%
OT 2010Talk America v. Michigan Bell Telephone Company Dba AT&T MichiganAmicus (for petitioner)Assistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon2048%
OT 2010Vincent E. Staub v. Proctor HospitalAmicus (for petitioner)Assistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon1863%
OT 2010Doretha H. Henderson, Authorized Representative of David L. Henderson, Deceased v. Eric K. Shineski, Secretary of Veterans AffairsRespondentAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralLost6265%

Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).