Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Private practice · D.C., in support of the Petitioner. · Assistant to the Solicitor General, Office of the Solicitor General, Solicitor General of the United States, Attorney · argued OT 2014–2025
36arguments since OT 2010
19–11record (side argued for), 63%
69Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
56%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2025 | T. M. v. University of Maryland Medical System Corporation | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 54 | 65% |
| OT 2024 | Tiktok, Inc. v. Garland | Respondent | Solicitor General of the United States | Won | 78 | 65% |
| OT 2024 | Bondi v. Vanderstok | Petitioner | Solicitor General of the United States | Won | 67 | 44% |
| OT 2024 | United States v. Skrmetti | Petitioner | Solicitor General of the United States | Lost | 64 | 45% |
| OT 2023 | Moyle v. United States | Respondent | Solicitor General of the United States | Won | 93 | 48% |
| OT 2023 | Fischer v. United States | Respondent | Solicitor General of the United States | Lost | 96 | 58% |
| OT 2023 | Food and Drug Administration v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine | Petitioner | Solicitor General of the United States | Won | 50 | 47% |
| OT 2023 | United States v. Rahimi | Petitioner | Solicitor General of the United States | Won | 60 | 40% |
| OT 2023 | Moore v. United States | Respondent | Solicitor General of the United States | Won | 128 | 45% |
| OT 2023 | No. 22-555 | Amicus (for petitioner) | Solicitor General of the United States | – | 9 | – |
| OT 2023 | Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo | Respondent | Solicitor General of the United States | Lost | 43 | 64% |
| OT 2023 | Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Association of America, Limited | Petitioner | Solicitor General of the United States | Won | 46 | 54% |
| OT 2023 | Moody v. Netchoice, LLC | Amicus (for respondent) | Solicitor General of the United States | Lost | 44 | 58% |
| OT 2023 | No. 22-1219 | Respondent | Solicitor General of the United States | – | 96 | – |
| OT 2022 | United States v. Texas | Petitioner | Solicitor General of the United States | Won | 98 | 66% |
| OT 2022 | Department of Education v. Brown | Petitioner | Solicitor General of the United States | Won | 74 | 46% |
| OT 2022 | Biden v. Nebraska | Petitioner | Solicitor General of the United States | Won | 75 | 63% |
| OT 2022 | Groff v. Dejoy | Respondent | Solicitor General of the United States | Lost | 86 | 44% |
| OT 2022 | No. 21-707 | Amicus (for respondent) | Solicitor General of the United States | – | 42 | – |
| OT 2022 | Moore v. Harper | Amicus (for respondent) | Solicitor General of the United States | Won | 25 | 39% |
| OT 2022 | Allen v. Milligan | Amicus (for respondent) | Solicitor General of the United States | Won | 15 | 53% |
| OT 2022 | Students for Fair Admissions Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College | Amicus (for respondent) | Solicitor General of the United States | Lost | 23 | 48% |
| OT 2021 | National Federation of Independent Business v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration | Respondent | Solicitor General of the United States | Lost | 82 | 56% |
| OT 2021 | Biden v. Texas | Petitioner | Solicitor General of the United States | Won | 105 | 54% |
| OT 2021 | United States v. Texas | Petitioner | Solicitor General of the United States | Lost | 59 | 72% |
| OT 2021 | West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency | Respondent | Solicitor General of the United States | Lost | 43 | 54% |
| OT 2021 | Dobbs v. Jackson WomenâS Health Organization | Amicus (for respondent) | Solicitor General of the United States | Lost | 26 | 64% |
| OT 2020 | National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Alston | Amicus (for respondent) | Office of the Solicitor General | Won | 17 | – |
| OT 2020 | Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta | Amicus (for petitioner) | Office of the Solicitor General | Won | 32 | 50% |
| OT 2019 | Kahler v. Kansas | Amicus (for respondent) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 9 | 90% |
| OT 2017 | City of Hays, Kansas v. Vogt | Amicus | Assistant to the Solicitor General | – | 22 | 74% |
| OT 2016 | Bravo-fernandez v. United States | – | Assistant to the Solicitor General | – | 20 | – |
| OT 2016 | Murr v. Wisconsin | Amicus (for respondent) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 17 | 72% |
| OT 2015 | United States v. Bryant | Petitioner | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 29 | 39% |
| OT 2015 | Tyson Foods, Inc., v. Bouaphakeo | Amicus (for respondent) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 13 | 71% |
| OT 2014 | No. 13-1075 | Petitioner | Assistant to the Solicitor General | – | 30 | – |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).