Edward C. Dumont
State government · San Francisco, Cal. · State Solicitor General, State Attorney General's office · argued OT 2013–2015
2arguments since OT 2010
1–1record (side argued for), 50%
32Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
73%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2015 | Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association | Respondent | State Attorney General's office | Won | 24 | – |
| OT 2013 | Riley v. California | Respondent | State Solicitor General | Lost | 40 | 73% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).