Easha Anand
Private practice · Menlo Park, California · Attorney · argued OT 2023–2025
5arguments since OT 2010
3–2record (side argued for), 60%
58Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
48%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2025 | United States Postal Service et al. v. Konan | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 27 | 59% |
| OT 2024 | Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. Horn | Respondent | Attorney | Won | 62 | 39% |
| OT 2023 | Chiaverini v. City of Napoleon, Ohio | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 66 | 43% |
| OT 2023 | Campos-chaves v. Garland | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 89 | – |
| OT 2023 | Murray v. Ubs Securities, LLC | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 45 | 50% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).