Douglas N. Letter
Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Attorney · argued OT 2018–2019
3arguments since OT 2010
0–1record (side argued for), 0%
51Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
43%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2019 | Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 51 | – |
| OT 2019 | Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau | Amicus | Attorney | – | 16 | 35% |
| OT 2018 | Department of Commerce v. New York | Amicus | Attorney | – | 11 | 50% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).