David W. Bowker

Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Attorney · argued OT 2012–2019

2arguments since OT 2010
1–1record (side argued for), 50%
38Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
65%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)

Arguments by term

Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
11213141516171819

Arguments

TermCaseSideRoleResultRemarks facedDoubt (Jev)
OT 2019U.S. Agency for Int'l Development v. Alliance for Open Society Int'lRespondentAttorneyLost3047%
OT 2012Agency for International Development et al. v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc. et al.RespondentAttorneyWon4683%

Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).