David J. Zimmer
Private practice · Boston, Massachusetts · Attorney · argued OT 2017–2020
3arguments since OT 2010
2–1record (side argued for), 67%
44Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
57%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2020 | Niz-chavez v. Garland, Attorney General | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 43 | 63% |
| OT 2020 | Garland v. Ming Dai | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 38 | 48% |
| OT 2017 | Pereira v. Sessions, Att'y Gen. | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 50 | 62% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).