David C. Frederick

Private practice · D.C. · Attorney, Assistant to the Solicitor General · argued OT 2010–2025

32arguments since OT 2010
11–21record (side argued for), 34%
37Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
68%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)

Arguments by term

Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
5101214161820222425

Arguments

TermCaseSideRoleResultRemarks facedDoubt (Jev)
OT 2025Daniel Rutherford v. United States (Together With Johnnie Markel Carter V. United States, No. 24-860)PetitionerAttorneyLost3557%
OT 2024Nuclear Regulatory Commission v. TexasRespondentAttorneyLost5272%
OT 2023Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. Moab Partners, L.P.Amicus (for respondent)Assistant to the Solicitor GeneralLost3557%
OT 2023Truck Insurance Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum CompanyRespondentAttorneyLost3076%
OT 2021Ledure v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyPetitionerAttorneyLost38–
OT 2021Hughes v. Northwestern UniversityPetitionerAttorneyWon5159%
OT 2021Mississippi v. TennesseeRespondentAttorneyWon3044%
OT 2018Parker Drilling Management Services, Ltd. v. NewtonRespondentAttorneyLost4865%
OT 2018The Dutra Group v. BattertonRespondentAttorneyLost3449%
OT 2018Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. AlbrechtRespondentAttorneyLost6161%
OT 2018Apple Inc. v. PepperRespondentAttorneyWon4359%
OT 2018BNSF Railway Company v. LoosRespondentAttorneyLost2670%
OT 2017China Agritech, Inc. v. ReshRespondentAttorneyLost2983%
OT 2017Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31RespondentAttorneyLost2866%
OT 2015Universal Health Services, Inc. v. Escobar, Julio et al.RespondentAttorneyLost1955%
OT 2015RJR Nabisco Inc. v. European CommunityRespondentAttorneyLost2970%
OT 2015Friedrichs v. California Teachers AssociationRespondentAttorneyWon29–
OT 2015Tyson Foods, Inc., v. BouaphakeoRespondentAttorneyWon3872%
OT 2014Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.PetitionerAttorneyWon2748%
OT 2014Tibble v. Edison InternationalPetitionerAttorneyWon3053%
OT 2013American Broadcasting Cos. v. Aereo, Inc.RespondentAttorneyLost3388%
OT 2012Mutual Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. v. Karen L. BartlettRespondentAttorneyLost4076%
OT 2012Fane Lozman v. the City of Riviera Beach, FloridaRespondentAttorneyLost4591%
OT 2012The Standard Fire Insurance Company v. Greg KnowlesRespondentAttorneyLost3689%
OT 2012Amgen Inc. et al. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsRespondentAttorneyWon2565%
OT 2011Gloria Gail Kurns, Executrix of the Estate of George M. Corson, Deceased et al. v. Railroad Friction Products Corporation et al.PetitionerAttorneyLost3581%
OT 2011Pacific Operators Offshore, LLP et al. v. Luisa L. Valladolid et al.RespondentAttorneyWon3763%
OT 2010CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Robert McbrideRespondentAttorneyWon4874%
OT 2010Janus Capital Group, Inc. et al. v. First Derivative TradersRespondentAttorneyLost5690%
OT 2010Russel Bruesewitz et al. v. Wyeth LLC, Fka Wyeth, Inc., Fka Wyeth Laboratories et al.PetitionerAttorneyLost4965%
OT 2010Astra USA, Inc. et al. v. Santa Clara County, CaliforniaRespondentAttorneyLost3586%
OT 2010Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. et al. v. James Siracusano et al.RespondentAttorneyWon3061%

Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).