David B. Salmons

Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Attorney · argued OT 2020

1argument since OT 2010
1–0record (side argued for), 100%
49Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
50%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)

Arguments by term

Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
120

Arguments

TermCaseSideRoleResultRemarks facedDoubt (Jev)
OT 2020City of San Antonio, Texas v. Hotels.com, L.P.RespondentAttorneyWon4950%

Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).