David A. O'Neil
Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Attorney · argued OT 2018–2025
3arguments since OT 2010
1–2record (side argued for), 33%
33Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
66%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2025 | Daniel Rutherford v. United States (Together With Johnnie Markel Carter V. United States, No. 24-860) | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 22 | 52% |
| OT 2021 | Shoop v. Twyford | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 15 | 88% |
| OT 2018 | North Carolina Department of Revenue v. the Kimberley Rice Kaestner 1992 Family Trust | Respondent | Attorney | Won | 63 | 58% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).