Daniel R. Ortiz
Private practice · Charlottesville, Va. · Attorney · argued OT 2010–2022
6arguments since OT 2010
3–3record (side argued for), 50%
30Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
63%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2022 | Jones v. Hendrix | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 28 | 53% |
| OT 2018 | Culbertson v. Berryhill | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 29 | 67% |
| OT 2017 | Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 19 | 75% |
| OT 2014 | Henderson v. United States | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 35 | 57% |
| OT 2012 | Maetta Vance v. Ball State University | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 40 | 64% |
| OT 2010 | Borough of Duryea, Pennsylvania et al. v. Charles J Guarnieri | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 27 | 62% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).