Daniel L. Geyser
Private practice · Dallas, Texas · Attorney, Assistant to the Solicitor General · argued OT 2016–2025
19arguments since OT 2010
9–9record (side argued for), 50%
44Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
66%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2025 | Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties et al. | Respondent | Attorney | Won | 30 | 66% |
| OT 2025 | Sripetch v. Securities and Exchange Commission | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 75 | 68% |
| OT 2023 | Office of the U.S. Trustee v. John Q. Hammons Fall 2006, LLC | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 45 | 70% |
| OT 2023 | Smith v. Spizzirri | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 15 | 29% |
| OT 2022 | Bittner v. United States | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 46 | 43% |
| OT 2022 | U.S., ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 64 | 67% |
| OT 2021 | Siegel v. Fitzgerald | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 59 | 63% |
| OT 2021 | Badgerow v. Walters | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 27 | 74% |
| OT 2020 | City of San Antonio, Texas v. Hotels.com, L.P. | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 47 | 69% |
| OT 2020 | Henry Schein Inc. v. Archer and White Sales Inc. | Respondent | Attorney | Won | 32 | 53% |
| OT 2019 | Thryv v. Click-to-call Technologies, LP | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 49 | 82% |
| OT 2018 | Taggart v. Lorenzen | Amicus | Assistant to the Solicitor General | – | 32 | 77% |
| OT 2018 | Emulex Corp. v. Varjabedian | Respondent | Attorney | Won | 47 | 83% |
| OT 2018 | Obduskey v. Mccarthy & Holthus LLP | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 48 | 73% |
| OT 2018 | Henry Schein Inc. v. Archer and White Sales Inc. | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 55 | 79% |
| OT 2017 | Lagos v. United States | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 38 | 57% |
| OT 2017 | Digital Realty Trust v. Somers | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 32 | 76% |
| OT 2017 | U.S. Bank National Association v. Village at Lakeridge | Respondent | Attorney | Won | 31 | 72% |
| OT 2016 | Midland Funding LLC v. Johnson | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 51 | 58% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).