Dan Himmelfarb
Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Attorney · argued OT 2011–2013
2arguments since OT 2010
1–1record (side argued for), 50%
37Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
62%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2013 | Ray Haluch Gravel Co. v. Cent. Pension Fund of Int'l Union of Operating Eng'rs | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 36 | 55% |
| OT 2011 | Kouichi Taniguchi v. Kan Pacific Saipan, Ltd., Dba Marianas Resort and Spa | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 37 | 68% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).