Damien M. Schiff
Private practice · Sacramento, California · Attorney · argued OT 2011–2022
2arguments since OT 2010
2–0record (side argued for), 100%
72Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
66%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2022 | Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 91 | 73% |
| OT 2011 | Chantell Sackett, et vir v. Environmental Protection Agency et al. | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 52 | 59% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).