D. John Sauer

Office of the Solicitor General · Washington, D.C. · Attorney, Solicitor General of the United States · argued OT 2018–2025

10arguments since OT 2010
4–3record (side argued for), 57%
97Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
70%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)

Arguments by term

Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
61819202122232425

Arguments

TermCaseSideRoleResultRemarks facedDoubt (Jev)
OT 2025Trump, President of the United States v. Cook–Solicitor General of the United States–9267%
OT 2025Trump, President of the United States et al. v. Barbara et al.PetitionerSolicitor General of the United StatesLost9483%
OT 2025Trump, President of the United States v. Slaughter et al.PetitionerSolicitor General of the United StatesWon9270%
OT 2025Mullin et al. v. Doe et al.PetitionerSolicitor General of the United StatesWon8473%
OT 2025Learning Resources, Inc. et al. v. Trump, President of the United States et al.–Solicitor General of the United States–13475%
OT 2025Watson, Secretary of State of Mississippi v. Republican National Committee et al.Amicus (for respondent)Solicitor General of the United StatesLost1375%
OT 2024Trump, President of the United States v. Casa, Inc.–Solicitor General of the United States–12967%
OT 2024Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board v. DrummondAmicus (for petitioner)Solicitor General of the United StatesLost27–
OT 2023Trump v. United StatesPetitionerAttorneyWon10763%
OT 2018Bucklew v. PrecytheRespondentAttorneyWon4462%

Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).