Christopher M. Curran
Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Attorney · argued OT 2013–2019
3arguments since OT 2010
1–2record (side argued for), 33%
51Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
72%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2019 | Opati v. Republic of Sudan | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 64 | 66% |
| OT 2018 | Republic of Sudan v. Harrison | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 38 | 70% |
| OT 2013 | Miss. ex rel. Hood v. Au Optronics Corp. | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 50 | 78% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).