Christopher Landau
Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Attorney · argued OT 2011–2016
7arguments since OT 2010
4–3record (side argued for), 57%
58Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
66%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2016 | Perry v. Merit Systems Protection Bd. | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 61 | 44% |
| OT 2016 | Maslenjak v. United States | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 50 | 67% |
| OT 2016 | Czyzewski v. Jevic Holding Corp. | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 93 | 66% |
| OT 2015 | Puerto Rico v. Franklin California Tax Free Trust | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 47 | 65% |
| OT 2015 | Puerto Rico v. Sanchez Valle | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 61 | 70% |
| OT 2015 | Directv, Inc. v. Imburgia | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 64 | 68% |
| OT 2011 | Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC et al. v. Vanessa Simmonds | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 28 | 83% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).