Christopher E. Mills
Private practice · Charleston, South Carolina · Attorney · argued OT 2024
1argument since OT 2010
0–1record (side argued for), 0%
–Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
43%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2024 | Martin v. United States | Amicus (for respondent) | Attorney | Lost | 6 | 43% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).