Cecillia D. Wang
Private practice · San Francisco, California · Attorney · argued OT 2018–2025
2arguments since OT 2010
1–1record (side argued for), 50%
61Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
53%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2025 | Trump, President of the United States et al. v. Barbara et al. | Respondent | Attorney | Won | 70 | 49% |
| OT 2018 | Nielsen v. Preap | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 51 | 57% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).